From the project
The TurnKey blog: where do we go from here?
When we started out a few years ago the scope of posts was very limited. Only news announcements, once every few months. The idea was to keep the signal to noise ratio down. But then a couple of years later we added tags to the blog and that changed everything because it meant we could offer a just-the-news feed to those who wanted it while opening up the blog to a broader range of subjects. Gradually the scope of the blog expanded until it included pretty much anything interesting we came across in our TurnKey adventures.
Initially posts on the blog that weren't directly related to TurnKey bothered me somewhat, but then I realized so long as there is a decent overlap between the type of people who might be interested in a post and the type of people interested in TurnKey, we shouldn't be too worried about going wide.
After all, if someone is interested in just news announcements they can sign up for the newsletter or the TurnKey news feed and they won't miss out on any important project update.
Also, the way I've come to see it, the borders of TurnKey are fuzzy and ever expanding. TurnKey isn't really about the stuff we make. That's just a means to an end. A way of lowering the bar enough that empowers as many people as possible to explore what GNU/Linux and free software has to offer. Not just in the technological sense but also the community around it. The developers, the users, the people that are the heart of soul of this strange and unintuitive phenomena of gift culture.
Also, TurnKey doesn't and couldn't exist on its own. It's just one organism in a tightly-woven ecosystem where all the parts are dependent on all others.
The relationships with other communities is multi-dimensional, but here's one example branching:
TurnKey -> Debian -> Linux -> Free software -> Computers / networking -> Technology.
All of that stuff is related to TurnKey and if you write about any of it it is likely to interest people who are also interested in TurnKey, and hence serve our purpose.
It all comes down to who you are writing for and why.
On one level, it would be preferable for stuff that goes on the TurnKey blog to be closely related to TurnKey, but mainly because that makes it more likely that our audience (e.g., regular blog subscribers) will be interested.
On another level, only a small amount traffic to the blog actually comes from regular subscribers. Mostly people reach blog posts when they're searching for something specific. The majority of these strangers immediately "bounce" elsewhere but there's also a small minority that discover TurnKey serendipitously that way, which is good for the project.
Hi Tim,
Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts on the blog side of the site. Also, I've noticed you are a very methodical, strategic thinker. I haven't come across too many people like that. It's a unique perspective that I have often found quite illuminating. Usually people miss the forest for the trees.
Another more childish reason I appeciate your feedback is that you are often the only one engaging back. The whole "If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it" bit. Sometimes I have to check the access logs just to make sure people are reading this stuff. They are. It's just that for most there is a yawning chasm between passive consumption and interaction.
With regards to your question, there was no specific trigger. It's something that has been building up for a long time. The realization that there is more to this than the numbers. That we need to develop people, not products. That the values and community are more important than any specific thing we make and the transient benefit it creates.
Also, if you're a creative person, you enjoy expressing yourself. Most of us in the developed world live in societies of abundance and after you get past the basic needs the desire for self expression and actualization can become pretty strong.
The term 'societal engineer' made me smile. I don't think we have pretensions at that level (yet). What I'm hoping is to do my small part to be an influence for good. The greatest good for the greatest numbers that I have the means to help.
Imagine if we all did our little bit to make the world a better place. Each in his own way. It used to be that you had to be a king or at least very rich to make an impact. Now anyone with a good idea and the willingness to put it out there can make a dent in the universe. I think that's what TurnKey is really all about at heart - a tool for amplifying the good free software and the Internet can provide.
I agree 100% that there seem to be overarching trends that impact the story of free software. Some bad some good. It's up to us to tilt the balance in the direction we want the future to take its course.
Like Alan Kay would say - the best way to predict the future is to invent it.
Cheers, Liraz
PS: sorry for the slow response time. It can all get a bit overhwleming at times.