<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Polls | TurnKey GNU/Linux</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/</link><description>Archived community polls from the Drupal website.</description><language>en-US</language><atom:link href="https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Would you be interested in buying a USB stick with the TurnKey appliance library on it?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-be-interested-buying-usb-stick-turnkey-appliance-library-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-be-interested-buying-usb-stick-turnkey-appliance-library-it/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:51:57 +0000</pubDate><description> Comments (4) All appliances have 32 bit downloads Reply 1 2014-04-28 It's just they default to 64 bit. Have a look at the TurnKey Linux on SourceForge.
regarding 32 bit app for system Reply 2 2014-04-28 Hi,
I found all app on 64 bit arch kindly support to download the 32 bit apps.
TKL on a stick Reply 3 2015-06-21 I'm trying to put your PDC on Stick to boot x86 thin client for varied home/office network. Currently it does not work becuase the PDC is 64Bit. I'm assuming using the VM install you …</description></item><item><title>Geronimo appliance ..?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/geronimo-appliance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/geronimo-appliance/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:02:04 +0000</pubDate><description> Hi there ...
I hope everone is going well. I had the idea that a Geronimo appliance would be a good thing to ask about. As I'm a new bod here, I felt it might be a good way to throw the question out to the group.
Question: How would you like the Geronimo Appliance configured?
It is multi-select, so you can pick the configuration item you want. (I don't know if others (or me either) can add options; but if you think of one, pass it on directly.)
Finally I inlcuded PHP because it's a ubiquitous …</description></item><item><title>Would a "cluster ready" appliance be useful for you?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-cluster-ready-appliance-be-useful-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-cluster-ready-appliance-be-useful-you/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:15:50 +0000</pubDate><description> I needed an appliance that I could deploy, from 1 template, and have the web application connect to a local MySQL(so there is no configuration needed on the application), but use read/write to one MySQL database, a.k.a Multi-Master. Also we wanted to be able to reuse the extra hdd space on each appliance to form a HA storage volume that we could distribute across all nodes and provide redudancy of those files(also can eliminate the need for Samba to share files between appliances).
Below are …</description></item><item><title>Would you like to be able to set time and/or keyboard on install/firstboot</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-be-able-set-time-andor-keyboard-installfirstboot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-be-able-set-time-andor-keyboard-installfirstboot/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:56:09 +0000</pubDate><description> Some have suggested that it would be good to be able to select/set keyboard and/or time on install/firstboot. I know that the devs are trying to keep it simple but perhaps it would be a good idea to include this?
So the question is, do you want keyboard and/or time selection to be included in appliances as a default firstboot script?
Comments (1) Relevant Documentation Reply 1 2014-10-19 Configure non-US keyboard
Configure timezone</description></item><item><title>How much do you want Debian based TurnKey appliances?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/turnkey-debian/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/turnkey-debian/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:39:24 +0000</pubDate><description> Comments (15) Debian is fine Reply 1 2011-03-31 I would prefer a CentOS based appliance. Or even a Fedora based one.
Thoughts on supporting CentOS Reply 2 2011-04-28 Will be more difficult than supporting Debian, but given the amount of interest expressed this deserves serious thought. In theory, the hard part isn't creating the appliances on any given distro. That's an infrastructure problem we can solve. The hard part will be all the additional testing required. But maybe in practice this …</description></item><item><title>How did you discover TurnKey?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/how-did-you-discover-turnkey/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/how-did-you-discover-turnkey/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate><description> Comments (4) Fair call Liraz Reply 1 2011-02-15 You have a good point but I still stand by my criticism no matter how unreasonable it may be :)
In DistroWatch&amp;#x27;s defense... Reply 2 2011-02-14 They get a ton of submissions and TurnKey is more of a meta distribution (e.g., distribution of distributions) than a conventional distribution with a single output product. Also, with 45 appliances and growing, do you just list Core? Do you list each appliance separately? I don't blame DistroWatch for …</description></item><item><title>Funding development: does web advertising (e.g., Google AdSense) annoy you?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/funding-development-does-web-advertising-eg-google-adsense-annoy-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/funding-development-does-web-advertising-eg-google-adsense-annoy-you/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:31:49 +0000</pubDate><description> Comments (3) Has to be out of the way Reply 1 2010-01-02 AdSense is OK with me as long as it does not interfere with the site's content.
Its a bit ugly but... Reply 2 2010-01-06 While I think its a bit ugly and may somewhat spoil the clean glossy professional look of the site, you've gotta pay the bills somehow! Go for it I say!
I'm not sure if this is a good idea or not, but perhaps you could offer a TKL membership/subcription that would allow donating members to disable the ads?
Yeah, AdSense …</description></item><item><title>What TurnKey Hub feature do you like the most?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/what-hub-feature-do-you-most/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/what-hub-feature-do-you-most/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:04:47 +0000</pubDate><description/></item><item><title>Funding development: reasonable extra cost to run a VPS with TurnKey Linux?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/funding-development-reasonable-extra-cost-run-vps-turnkey-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/funding-development-reasonable-extra-cost-run-vps-turnkey-linux/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:09:55 +0000</pubDate><description/></item><item><title>Funding development: assuming we don't charge a monthly fee (e.g., $5/month) how much should we add to Amazon EC2 usage fees?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/amazon-ec2-fees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/amazon-ec2-fees/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:58:49 +0000</pubDate><description> Comments (15) More feedback from those who voted for 0% Reply 1 2009-12-04 We'd like to be able to hire a few people to join the team and work full-time on simplifying deployment of open source software. That means figuring out how to fund it since even people working on open source software still need to make a living somehow... To clarify our thinking, we're currently considering simplifying the pricing somehow (e.g., only usage fees or only a mark-up on usage fees) and we'd like some …</description></item><item><title>Are you interested in commercial support for TurnKey appliances?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/are-you-interested-commercial-support-turnkey-appliances/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/are-you-interested-commercial-support-turnkey-appliances/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:24:14 +0000</pubDate><description/></item><item><title>Would you be interested in TurnKey appliances on optimized hardware?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-be-interested-turnkey-appliances-optimized-hardware/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-be-interested-turnkey-appliances-optimized-hardware/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate><description/></item><item><title>How important is 64bit support for you?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/how-important-64bit-support-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/how-important-64bit-support-you/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate><description> Comments (5) Unfortunatly for many of us using a 32bit is not an option. Reply 1 2011-02-09 I have been looking and trying turnkey linux for 3 months, I felt really excited about the idea behind turnkey linux, having such a good configuration ready to use, really, save us a lot of time. In addition that wonderful backup process is just, unique.
In our company we use a proprietary framework that loads all the data in memory, that is the reason why we need a lot of RAM. Anyway i thought that …</description></item><item><title>Where do you expect to run software appliances?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/where-do-you-expect-run-software-appliances/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/where-do-you-expect-run-software-appliances/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:18:16 +0000</pubDate><description/></item><item><title>Would you prefer virtual appliances based on Ubuntu or Debian?</title><link>https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-prefer-software-appliances-based-ubuntu-or-debian/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.turnkeylinux.org/polls/would-you-prefer-software-appliances-based-ubuntu-or-debian/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:15:23 +0000</pubDate><description> Comments (3) Interesting take on Ubuntu vs Debian Reply 1 2009-11-03 I just found an interesting article on Ubuntu vs Debian for server use.
The bit that really caught my attention (partial quote):
...I realised that I didn’t trust the build quality of the [Ubuntu] LTS releases as much as I trusted the build quality of Debian stable releases. Thinking about it further, I was having a hard time convincing myself to run an Ubuntu server. The reason being the way packages are tested in the Debian …</description></item></channel></rss>