TurnKey Linux Virtual Appliance Library

TKLPatch summer contest summary: let the judging begin!

It all started with a happy accident

I have a confession to make. This contest, which is directly fueling the largest expansion of the TurnKey library since the project started, is a happy accident. It wasn't something we planned. It wasn't on our summer todo list. It was just one of those unexpected, spontaneous ideas that light up the inside of your brain like a flash bulb, and demand you take action. Or else! (you won't get any sleep)

Back in June we had just launched the TurnKey Hub and were getting ready to focus all our energies on releasing TKLBAM. I logged into PayPal and noticed our donated beer budget had a sad little beer belly. It was just sitting there, giving me an accusing look. I felt guilty. Surely all those people who donated expected we would put these funds to better use. That's when it hit me. It was too much to buy beer, but not so much that we couldn't risk it all on a fun experiment...

I talked it over with Alon and on an impulse we decided to do a contest, but not just any contest. A wild and wet summer open source bonanza! With ponies!

What happened next took us both by surprise.

From the far corners of the globe... two superstars emerge

I figured if we were lucky we would attract about a dozen or so contributors who would create appliances for one or two of their favorite open source applications.

But what I do know. It turns out we got even luckier with two superstar developers who took different but complimentary approaches, and blew us away with over two dozen TKLPatches for an amazing range of excellent open source software, some of which we had never even heard of before!

From India, Basil Kurian went wide with about 20 relatively straightforward new appliances, developed at a furious pace that was hard to keep up with. Like a hungry bird of prey, Basil scanned the open source savanna from above, then swooped down for kills he could snatch back whole to his nest.

From Venezuela, Adrian Moya dug in deep, with about 10 relatively challenging appliances. His attention to detail rivals some of our best work to date. Adrian, like a tiger, stalked his prey, taking a slower, more deliberate approach. He went after larger targets, sunk his teeth in and tore them to pieces.

There were a few other contributions as well but the bulk of developments can be credited directly to these two admirable and highly skilled individuals.

Looking at the big picture, what they've accomplished is not only a tribute to their own impressive abilities but also to the power of the open source ecosystem they leveraged. I can't think of any other area of human enterprise where a loosely knit band of individuals is empowered (in their spare time no less) to help enable thousands of individuals and organizations all over the world to take advantage of so much technological innovation. That's what TurnKey means to Alon and I and we're delighted that more people are getting to share this experience!

Help! How do we figure out who should win?

It was probably best for the project that our two superstars took different complimentary approaches. But it complicates our decision as a direct apples to apples comparison isn't possible. That means instead of just counting the number of submissions we actually have to think this through, and we'd like the community to help us with that.

So what's at stake? You mean besides bragging rights and immortality in the TurnKey hall of fame?

Judging criteria

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to help us figure out who added the most total value to the project. That means the quantity of contributions multiplied by their quality. Yes, we realize quality is inherently subjective and open to endless interpretation. We've thrown in some rough metrics and have identified dimensions of evaluation so it isn't entirely arbitrary, but let's not kid ourselves - playing with grading systems and numbers won't save us from making subjective, qualitative judgments.

To make this a bit simpler we've attempted to summarize contributions in three key dimensions:

  • Anticipated interest from our audience: the more people will benefit from an appliance, the more valuable it is. Unfortunately, we don't have a TurnKey crystal ball (yet), so we can only make educated guesses. Mostly we sampled data from various public resources provided by Google (e.g., Google Trends, the number of search results for a given name, the page rank of a project's web site, etc.)

    Grades: minimal (), modest (), large () and huge ()

  • Integration effort: an appliance saves users the trouble of finding the right components, integrating them into a working solution and testing it themselves. Hard appliance integrations are more valuable because they save users more trouble.

    Examples of factors we took into account when we evaluated integration effort includes:

    1. how well aligned the integration is with a well defined need
    2. the number of integrated components
    3. whether or not pre-installation (e.g., seeding databases) was required
    4. approximate testing difficulty
    5. added value such as custom glue scripts

    Grades: simple (), involved (), challenging () and brilliant ()

  • Documentation: A pre-requisite to adding an appliance to the library is that we understand what it achieves, how it does it and why. Good documentation makes all of this easier for us, and also serves to educate the community and promote discussion. Truly awesome documentation goes beyond that and adds significant value to end-users by making it easier to get started (e.g., tutorials, HOWTOs, documentation resources, etc.)

    Grades: minimal (), good (), excellent (), awesome ()

Summary of submissions competing for the gold

Adrian Moya
TKLPatch Audience Integration Documentation
Asterisk: VoIP PBX
Magento: ecommerce
OpenLDAP
Alfresco: enterprise CMS
Web content filtering proxy: DansGuardian + ClamAV
Big Blue Button: web conferencing
Plone: Zope-based CMS
Bacula: network backup tool
Gitorious: Git collaborative repository hosting
Basil Kurian
TKLPatch Audience Integration Documentation
Mono ASP.NET: IIS replacement
vTiger CRM
Cacti: web-based graphing tool
Prestashop: e-commerce / shopping cart
SugarCRM Community Edition
Tomato cart: ecommerce
Status.NET: micro blogging
eFront: eLearning software
OrangeHRM
Vanilla forum
Groupoffice: groupware
LEMP stack: Linux, Nginx, Mysql, PHP
EyeOS: web desktop
Foswiki: structured wiki fork of TWiki
Fedena: school/campus management system
Spree: ecommerce
Retrospectiva: agile project management
Typo: rails blogware

Notes:

  • This is not a complete listing of submissions, just those that are most likely to be included in the upcoming release batch.
  • I'm linking to the forum posts where the TKLPatch submissions are discussed for future reference and so anyone who wants can make up their own mind.

Third place?

While the vast bulk of contributions came from Basil and Adrian, there were a few sporadic contributions by other community members. Here too we're interested in feedback from the community on who should win third place, or alternatively whether we should just eliminate third place and merge it with second place. Or something else...

Candidates:

  • Bilal: contributed a barebones Citadel appliance, and a partially completed JBoss appliance.
  • JedMeister: contributed a partially finished KnowledgeTree patch, researched possible integration details for the TurnKey Core Client and provided encouragement, feedback and moral support throughout the contest to all involved.
  • Neil Wilson: contributed a patch fixing various issues with the TurnKey Core Lucid beta.
  • Rik Goldman: contributed an IEP-IPP appliance, that could make it easier for school to use open source software to track students with special needs. Before the contest Rik and his band of merry students were our most prolific community appliance developers (Ampache, LimeSurvey, Elgg). Rik also contributed excellent supplemental documentation on the TKLPatch development process.

So now what? That's where you come in!

Vote on who should win and share your thoughts with the community in the comments below. If for some reason you'd rather not share your thoughts publicly feel free to contact us in a private e-mail.

You can get future posts delivered by email or good old-fashioned RSS.
TurnKey also has a presence on Google+, Twitter and Facebook.

Comments

This was real fun

And I want to congratulate everyone who made an effort. Specially Basil, which put a pressure in the contest getting so much patches in so little time! Good work! I've learned a lot, and I think we all are winners here, as we will have a more complete appliance library for our use. 

Basil Kurian's picture

This is the first time I 'm contributing to an opensource projct

Thanks Adrian. The effort you paid on each appliances amazed me, especially the  LDAP appliance.

At the end of this contest , there are some apllications left in my mind. I tried to create patches for them, but failed :(

* Jaiku engine [ http://code.google.com/p/jaikuengine/ ]

* OpenMind [ http://openmind.sourceforge.net ]

* iRedmail [ http://www.iredmail.org/ ]

* DimDim


I'll lay you a hand on those.

Already did it with iRedMail. Check it out. I wouldn't use DimDim anymore, they turned their back to opensource. That's why I came with BigBlueButton. I'm about to release a TKLDevEnv patch, I'm hoping you'll try it and give some feedback. This is my first time contributing to opensource too! It's a great experience.

Basil Kurian's picture

Thanks

Yes , I'll try the iRedmail patch , earlier i thought that it was not completed.


Jeremy's picture

TKL my first FOSS too :)

Congratulations to both of you guys! But I think we're all winners here at TKL!

As for judging...

Third place: To me this is a no brainer! While all the 3rd place canditates have provided valuable contributions I personally think that Rik Goldman (and his band of merry student) are the clear third place winners. Even though much of his/their contribution happened before the competition was launched, I think his involvement with TKL and TKLPatching has been a pivotal part of the success of this competition. He was the TKLPatch 'trailblazer' so to speak!

First & Second places: This is where it gets really tricky. Ten points to both for effort, engagement and community spirit. I appreciate the assistance with context and criteria Liraz. I am almost inclined to say that its a tie because they have both contributed a huge amount to TKL, not just through their patches but also their involvement with the community and their warmth and willingness to help others out (such as myself). But especially after Liraz and Alon dug deep to boost the prize money (2nd is now almost what 1st place was initially) I think that would be a cop out. I hate having to choose but I think I'd have to give to Adrian by a whisker.

Its a tough call to make, and not one that I really enjoy (I tend to be a fence sitter at times like this). But I think what pushed Adrian over the line for me was his level of documentation of what his patch does and usualy why. Whilst its not necessary for a patch to have this info, it makes it easier for a novice (such as myself) to try to understand what's going on.

Soo many success stories

I'm overwhelmed by the tremendous success both Basil and Adrian have had. I'm also overwhelmed by the success of the contest...I was overwhelmed hearing about TKLBAM, and now that I'm using I'm still thoroughly impressed.

I've tried to look carefully at all the patches, and appreciate the time, patience and commitment I know went into every single one. I connect most with eFront and Fedena, but I'm not gonna let that bias me.

Ultimately, it's when I get a look at the really confounding TKLPatches, and see the creative strategies and tactics that went into them that I am really inspired and really learning. Being able to take that back to students and work out with them how each was finessed is for me where the success is most powerful.

I'm quite eager to put some of these solutions to work along side the other TKL solutions we've put to work at Chelsea School - mediawiki; gallery; LAMP with IEP-IPP patch, Ampache patch, and LimeSurvey patch; and our easy-to-forget reliance on TKLBAM with the HUB and TKLPatch.

These successes are a testament to the power of cooperation, community, and mutual support - sincerely my political ideals for social and economic justice are realized in this community.

 

Given that final note, the idea of Ushahidi and an appliance for it struck a very powerful chord with my wife and I [1]. I think it would be hard to compete with the good for humanity such a patch and eventual appliance would do.

[1] http://www.turnkeylinux.org/forum/general/20100930/ushahidi-appliance


Solution Proposal: Playoffs!

I got an idea, why don't you guys create a final challenge. An appliance selected by the judges that both contestants have to implement. The one that comes up with best implementation in the shortest amount of time, wins the first place.

That way it would be easier to determine a winner since you would be comparing "apples to apples" and the community will benefit of another much anticipated TKL appliance.

Cheers

VOIP

That's a nice program. more..

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <span> <div> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <map> <area> <hr> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <tr> <td> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong> <font> <del> <ins> <sub> <sup> <quote> <blockquote> <pre> <address> <code> <cite> <strike> <caption>

More information about formatting options

Leave this field empty. It's part of a security mechanism.
(Dear spammers: moderators are notified of all new posts. Spam is deleted immediately)