petrdruker's picture
Real name: 

Name

Name
petrdruker

Personal details

Short Bio
Rabulistics can also be called an integral part of black rhetoric. Rabulist methods help those who use them, encourage them to argue, convince other people of something, persuade them, make them doubt, etc. Knowledge of the basic false arguments of Rabulistics will be useful not only to speakers, but also to ordinary people. After all, everyone can find sophisticated arguments to write my paper cheap in this trap, and only knowledge of the mechanism of these actions can help you protect against manipulation. You can participate in our “Modern Rhetoric” program. Let's look at some common rabulistic tricks. 1 Double terminology This technique of rabulistics is based on the difference in semantic shades of words that can be called synonymous. For example, our soldier will be a scout, and an enemy will be a spy. The reaction to the information presented will largely depend on what word the speaker or the media selects. 2 Double standards There is a winged Latin expression "what is permitted to Jupiter, is not allowed to the bull." That is, the same act can either be encouraged or reproached, depending on who committed it. For example, the introduction of troops from our side is a compelled and justified protective measure, and the introduction of troops from another state is an act of aggression. 3 Retroactive rationalization After any unacceptable action has been committed, there are excuses proving that it was not at all unacceptable, but quite acceptable or even necessary. For example, in the country there is an increase in the tax rate. Of course, this is a negative event. But a person using rabulistics can present it as a necessary step to increase the budget and develop infrastructure. 4 Appeal to the individual It is not the opponent’s thesis that is criticized, but his personality. That is, the model “Ivanov is not right because he has a mistake in argumentation” is used, but the model “Ivanov is not right because he is stupid.” This is a false argument. Obviously, even a person with unsuccessful past ideas and a bad reputation can express something worthwhile. If he really is mistaken, then it will not be difficult to indicate his mistake. 5 “Could be worse” Also a very common false argument. Any negative information can be turned into positive by adding this magic phrase: “It could have been worse.” A couple of examples: The ruble fell, but could fall stronger! We were lucky! Workers could not fulfill the plan, but could do even less! We must enjoy the volume of work done! Or in another form: Despite the forecasts, the inflation rate was not 15, but only 10 percent! It seems to be a success, but not really. Also in Rabulistics, sophisms and demagogic techniques are widely used. You can find some other false arguments in this article, but you can learn about how to reason consistently and logically in this lesson. If you start to analyze the arguments that are used, for example, in the media, you may notice that some of them are false, some are misleading. Practice: watch the news release or any talk by any speaker trying to convince the audience of something. How many times have you noticed the use of any false argument? Have you noticed this before? People usually do not think about how they are presented with information. Experiment: try using some of the described false arguments in a conversation. Most likely, your trick will not be figured out. Therefore, you need to be very careful and always critically evaluate everything that you are told.

History

Member for
5 years 11 months